{"id":1122,"date":"2026-05-13T09:01:18","date_gmt":"2026-05-13T09:01:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/?p=1122"},"modified":"2026-05-06T09:03:50","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T09:03:50","slug":"butterfly-valve-vs-globe-valve-control-applications","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/butterfly-valve-vs-globe-valve-control-applications\/","title":{"rendered":"Drosselklappe vs. Geradsitzventil f\u00fcr Regelanwendungen: Durchflusscharakteristik, Regelbarkeit und Cv"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Butterfly valve vs globe valve for control applications<\/strong> is not a simple \u201ccheap valve versus precise valve\u201d decision. A butterfly valve is usually a compact, rotary, high-Cv option for large-flow, low-to-moderate pressure-drop services, while a globe valve is usually the stronger choice when the loop needs high throttling precision, predictable trim characterization, severe pressure-drop handling, or wider controllable range. The practical conclusion is this: choose the valve that gives the right installed flow characteristic and controllable travel window, not merely the highest Cv or the lowest purchase price<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In control valve work, Cv<\/strong> describes flow capacity, rangeability<\/strong> describes the usable controllable flow range, and flow characteristic<\/strong> describes how valve travel changes flow capacity. Authoritative control-valve references distinguish inherent characteristic, measured at constant pressure drop, from installed characteristic, which changes once the valve is placed into a real piping system with pumps, friction losses, and varying pressure drop. This article compares butterfly and globe valves through those three lenses, then gives a practical selection workflow for engineers, EPC teams, and maintenance groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Side-by-side<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Why the \u201cButterfly Valve vs Globe Valve\u201d Question Gets Oversimplified<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Many selection conversations begin with a shortcut: \u201cUse a globe valve for control and a butterfly valve for isolation.\u201d That advice is safe in some cases, but it is not complete. Modern high-performance butterfly valves can perform stable modulating service in many industrial systems, especially at larger line sizes where a globe valve becomes heavy, expensive, and pressure-drop intensive. Conversely, a globe valve may still be the best choice where the process demands narrow control tolerance, high pressure drop, anti-cavitation trim, noise attenuation, or repeatable linear\/equal-percentage behavior.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The real decision depends on service conditions. A cooling-water loop, a low-pressure air duct, a large natural-gas bypass, a steam letdown station, and a chemical dosing line do not ask the valve to do the same job. They differ in pressure drop, line size, flow turndown, allowable leakage, fluid density, vapor pressure, solids, noise limit, and actuator response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For readers building an internal selection standard, Carter Valve\u2019s guide on what a control valve is and how its components work<\/a> is a good foundation. If the application includes liquid flashing or cavitation risk, the related article on cavitation vs. flashing in control valves<\/a> should be reviewed before a valve style is finalized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Flow Characteristics: Inherent vs Installed Behavior<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A control valve\u2019s inherent flow characteristic<\/strong> is the relationship between valve opening and flow capacity when the pressure drop across the valve is held constant. Spirax Sarco defines inherent characteristic in this way and explains the common fast-opening, linear, and equal-percentage types used in water and steam applications. Valin makes the same important distinction: inherent curves come from controlled test conditions, while installed curves reflect the real system, including piping losses and pump curves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That distinction matters because the control loop does not experience the catalog curve. It experiences the installed curve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Control<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Flow characteristic<\/th>What it means<\/th>Where it tends to fit<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Quick opening<\/td>Large flow increase occurs with small initial travel<\/td>On\/off or relief-style behavior, not precise continuous throttling<\/td><\/tr>
Linear<\/td>Equal travel increments create approximately equal flow-capacity increments at constant \u0394P<\/td>Systems where valve pressure drop stays relatively stable<\/td><\/tr>
Equal percentage<\/td>Equal travel increments create equal percentage changes in flow capacity<\/td>Systems where valve \u0394P varies strongly with flow, often pipe-heavy systems<\/td><\/tr>
Modified rotary<\/td>Disc or ball geometry produces a curve between linear and equal percentage<\/td>Many rotary control valves, including high-performance butterfly valves<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Globe valves have a major advantage here: the trim can often be selected or changed to provide linear or equal-percentage behavior. Valin notes that globe valves are available with either linear or equal-percentage inherent characteristics, while high-performance butterfly valves tend to be approximately midway between equal percentage and linear. This does not make butterfly valves poor control valves. It means the engineer must verify whether the installed curve provides acceptable loop gain over the expected travel range.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cv: Why Higher Flow Capacity Is Both a Benefit and a Trap<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Cv<\/strong> is a valve flow coefficient used to express how much flow a valve can pass for a given pressure drop and fluid condition. Emerson\u2019s control valve sizing guidance identifies required sizing inputs such as upstream and downstream pressures, temperature, flow rate, density, pipe size, pressure class, trim type, and noise limit. The ISA75.01 committee covers control valve sizing standards related to ANSI\/ISA-75.01.01 and IEC 60534-2-1 flow equations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A butterfly valve typically provides a higher Cv per nominal size than a globe valve because its flow path is more open and less tortuous. That is valuable in large-flow services where the available pressure drop is limited. A globe valve usually has a lower Cv per size because the flow path turns through the body and trim, but that same geometry supports better throttling, pressure-drop control, and trim options.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Control<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Cv-related question<\/th>Butterfly valve implication<\/th>Globe valve implication<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Is line size large and available \u0394P low?<\/td>Often attractive because high Cv reduces permanent pressure loss<\/td>May require larger body and higher cost to achieve same capacity<\/td><\/tr>
Is precise low-flow control required?<\/td>Can be difficult if the valve is oversized and operates near closed<\/td>Usually stronger because trim can be characterized for low-flow control<\/td><\/tr>
Is cavitation or flashing possible?<\/td>Higher pressure recovery can increase risk in some liquid services<\/td>Severe-service trims may better manage pressure drop and recovery<\/td><\/tr>
Is energy loss a concern?<\/td>Lower pressure drop can reduce pumping or compression penalty<\/td>Higher pressure drop may be acceptable if control quality is critical<\/td><\/tr>
Is the valve mostly open during normal operation?<\/td>May have poor control authority if nearly wide open<\/td>May still provide usable travel if correctly sized<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A high Cv is not automatically good. If the valve is too large, the controller may force it to operate close to the seat, where small travel changes create large flow changes and poor resolution. Bray warns that oversized control valves sacrifice control resolution, while undersized valves may restrict flow and contribute to choked flow, cavitation, or flashing. The best valve is not the one with the largest Cv; it is the one with the correct Cv at normal, minimum, and maximum operating points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rangeability and the Useful Control Window<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Rangeability<\/strong> is the ratio between the maximum controllable flow and the minimum controllable flow at which the valve can still regulate acceptably. In real projects, rangeability is often confused with the full catalog travel range. A valve may physically move from 0% to 100%, but the useful control region is usually smaller.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bray\u2019s sizing guidance states that an ideal control valve often operates around 60%\u201380% open<\/strong>, with 20%\u201380%<\/strong> used as a normal operating range to improve control fidelity and resolution. That rule of thumb is valuable because it forces the selection team to think about where the valve will actually operate after installation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Rangeability<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Sizing outcome<\/th>Operating symptom<\/th>Control consequence<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Oversized valve<\/td>Normal flow occurs at very low opening<\/td>Poor resolution, hunting, seat wear, unstable control<\/td><\/tr>
Properly sized valve<\/td>Normal flow sits in the mid-travel region<\/td>Better loop response, stable resolution, room for disturbances<\/td><\/tr>
Undersized valve<\/td>Valve stays nearly wide open at normal or peak flow<\/td>Flow limit, high pressure drop, inability to meet demand<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Globe valves generally provide better controllability over a wider range because the plug and seat geometry can be tailored. Butterfly valves can control very well when the operating window is not too wide and the valve is sized so the disc does not spend most of its life nearly closed or nearly fully open. In large utility, cooling, HVAC, water, low-pressure gas, and some process services, that can make a butterfly valve a very practical control choice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For butterfly valve sizing and actuation context, Carter Valve\u2019s actuator sizing guide for butterfly valves<\/a> and high-performance butterfly valve overview<\/a> are useful follow-up resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When a Butterfly Valve Makes More Sense<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A butterfly valve often makes sense when the line is large, the pressure drop is moderate, the process can tolerate a less specialized flow characteristic, and the value of compactness is high. The advantages become stronger as pipe size increases. A large globe valve can be heavy, expensive, and difficult to support. A high-performance butterfly valve can offer high capacity, shorter face-to-face length, lower weight, and smaller actuator requirements in many services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Butterfly valves also fit services where the valve is used for coarse or moderate control rather than extremely fine throttling. Examples include cooling water, process water, low-pressure air, utility gas, vaporizer utility lines, many heat-exchanger bypasses, and large isolation\/modulating duties where a tight space envelope matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Butterfly valve advantage<\/th>Practical value<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
High Cv per size<\/td>Lower pressure drop and potentially smaller valve body<\/td><\/tr>
Compact face-to-face<\/td>Easier installation in crowded pipe racks or skids<\/td><\/tr>
Lower weight<\/td>Reduced support load and easier handling<\/td><\/tr>
Rotary actuation<\/td>Simple automation and fast response options<\/td><\/tr>
Good large-line economics<\/td>Lower total installed cost in many large-bore services<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The key is to specify the right butterfly valve. A general-purpose resilient-seated valve is not the same as a high-performance double-offset or severe-service butterfly valve. For Carter Valve options and technical background, see the butterfly valve product category<\/a>, the high-performance double-offset butterfly valve<\/a>, and the guide on types of butterfly valves<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When a Globe Valve Is the Better Control Valve<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A globe valve is usually the better choice when the service demands high control precision, high rangeability, severe pressure drop management, anti-cavitation trim, low-noise trim, or predictable characterized behavior. Because the flow passes through a plug and seat, the designer has more freedom to shape the trim and manage pressure drop in stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This matters in steam, boiler feedwater, chemical injection, compressor recycle, high-pressure liquid letdown, and services where poor control quality creates safety, quality, or energy consequences. A globe valve can be more expensive and heavier, but it may reduce process variability, protect downstream equipment, and prevent recurring maintenance caused by noise, cavitation, or unstable control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Globe valve advantage<\/th>Practical value<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Characterized trim<\/td>Linear or equal-percentage behavior can be selected<\/td><\/tr>
Better throttling precision<\/td>Stronger option for tight process control<\/td><\/tr>
Severe-service trim options<\/td>Better handling of high \u0394P, cavitation, flashing, or noise<\/td><\/tr>
Good low-flow resolution<\/td>Useful where minimum controllable flow matters<\/td><\/tr>
Established control-valve documentation<\/td>Easier to specify for many process-control loops<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Carter Valve\u2019s control valve category<\/a>, general-purpose globe control valve<\/a>, and severe-service ANSI control valve<\/a> are natural internal links for readers who conclude that globe-style control is the right direction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Installed Characteristics: The System Decides the Final Answer<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A valve cannot be selected in isolation from the system. In a pipe-heavy system, pressure drop available to the valve may change significantly as flow changes. Valin explains that an equal-percentage valve installed in a system with significant pipe and fitting losses can produce a nearly linear installed characteristic. Spirax Sarco also emphasizes that valve characteristics should be matched to the installation characteristic, not evaluated only as catalog curves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is where many butterfly-versus-globe debates go wrong. The question is not \u201cWhich valve has the better inherent curve?\u201d The question is \u201cWhich valve gives the most usable installed curve after the system pressure drop, pump curve, pipe losses, and control objective are included?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, a butterfly valve with high Cv may work very well in a large cooling-water bypass where pressure drop is low and control tolerance is moderate. The same valve may perform poorly in a high-pressure liquid letdown service because pressure recovery and cavitation risk dominate the decision. A globe valve may be ideal for boiler feedwater but unnecessarily expensive for a large low-pressure ventilation or utility line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Selection Decision Matrix<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The decision matrix below is a practical starting point. It should not replace sizing software or engineering review, but it quickly shows where each valve style usually fits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Decision<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Selection factor<\/th>Butterfly valve usually fits when\u2026<\/th>Globe valve usually fits when\u2026<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Line size<\/td>Medium to very large lines make weight and cost important<\/td>Small to medium lines make precision more valuable than body size<\/td><\/tr>
Available pressure drop<\/td>Low-to-moderate \u0394P is available<\/td>Moderate-to-high \u0394P must be managed<\/td><\/tr>
Required rangeability<\/td>Moderate controllable range is acceptable<\/td>Wide controllable range is required<\/td><\/tr>
Flow characteristic<\/td>Modified rotary behavior is acceptable after installed analysis<\/td>Linear or equal-percentage trim is required<\/td><\/tr>
Cv requirement<\/td>High Cv per size is beneficial<\/td>Lower Cv per size is acceptable or desired for authority<\/td><\/tr>
Cavitation\/noise<\/td>Risk is low or manageable<\/td>Severe-service trim is needed<\/td><\/tr>
Solids or slurry tendency<\/td>Open flow path can help in some services<\/td>Tortuous path may be prone to plugging, depending on trim<\/td><\/tr>
Footprint and weight<\/td>Compact, lightweight installation is valuable<\/td>Larger body and support are acceptable for control quality<\/td><\/tr>
Lifecycle cost<\/td>Lower installed cost and simpler actuation matter<\/td>Reduced variability, severe-service life, and accuracy justify cost<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A useful internal transition here is Carter Valve\u2019s valve leakage classes guide<\/a>, because leakage expectations often influence whether a control valve must also provide shutoff or whether a separate isolation valve should be installed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Common Mistakes in Butterfly and Globe Control Valve Selection<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The first common mistake is sizing only for maximum flow. If the normal flow is much lower than the maximum, the valve may spend most of its time near closed position. This creates poor control resolution and can make the loop look like a tuning problem when the real issue is valve sizing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second mistake is comparing Cv values without comparing pressure recovery and cavitation behavior. A high-Cv rotary valve can be the right choice in a low-pressure-drop service, but it may be the wrong choice where liquid pressure drops below vapor pressure at the vena contracta. Emerson\u2019s sizing guidance specifically notes that when pressure drop is high enough for liquid vaporization, choked-flow pressure drop must be considered instead of simply using the actual pressure drop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The third mistake is ignoring actuator and positioner performance. A valve with the right body style but poor actuator resolution, excessive deadband, or weak position feedback will not control well. Rotary valves and sliding-stem valves have different friction, torque, thrust, and linkage behavior, so actuator sizing must be treated as part of valve selection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fourth mistake is forcing a globe valve into every control service. That can waste energy and budget in large, low-pressure-drop applications where a butterfly valve would deliver adequate control with lower pressure loss and smaller installed footprint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Specification Checklist for EPC and Procurement Teams<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A strong control-valve requisition should make vendors prove performance at minimum, normal, and maximum conditions. It should also ask for installed behavior, not only catalog Cv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Checklist item<\/th>What to request<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Service conditions<\/td>Fluid, phase, density, viscosity, vapor pressure, temperature, P1, P2, flow range<\/td><\/tr>
Cv at operating points<\/td>Required Cv at minimum, normal, and maximum flow<\/td><\/tr>
Valve opening<\/td>Predicted travel at each operating point, preferably targeting useful mid-travel range<\/td><\/tr>
Characteristic<\/td>Linear, equal percentage, modified equal percentage, or vendor-specific curve<\/td><\/tr>
Rangeability<\/td>Required controllable flow ratio and expected installed rangeability<\/td><\/tr>
Cavitation\/flashing\/noise<\/td>Calculation and mitigation method where applicable<\/td><\/tr>
Actuator\/positioner<\/td>Torque or thrust margin, resolution, deadband, fail action, feedback<\/td><\/tr>
Shutoff and leakage<\/td>Seat leakage class and whether separate isolation is required<\/td><\/tr>
Documentation<\/td>Sizing sheet, curves, drawings, materials, test reports, IOM, spare parts<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This is where Carter Valve\u2019s broader valve products page<\/a> and modulating control valves category<\/a> can help readers move from comparison to product selection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cost and Lifecycle Considerations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A butterfly valve often wins on purchase price, weight, and installation cost in larger sizes. A globe valve often wins when process variability is expensive, pressure drop is severe, or poor control creates quality or safety risk. The best lifecycle decision weighs energy loss, maintenance frequency, actuator cost, spare parts, downtime, and process stability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In one practical example, replacing a globe valve with a butterfly valve in a large utility-water service may reduce pressure loss and installed weight without hurting control. In another example, replacing a globe control valve with a butterfly valve on a high-pressure liquid letdown may create cavitation, seat damage, and unstable control. Both statements can be true because the system decides.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The right choice between a butterfly valve and a globe valve for control applications depends on flow characteristics, rangeability, Cv, installed pressure drop, control precision, and lifecycle risk<\/strong>. Butterfly valves are often the better choice for large-flow, compact, low-to-moderate pressure-drop services where high Cv and lower installed cost matter. Globe valves are usually the better choice where precision throttling, wide rangeability, characterized trim, cavitation control, noise control, or severe pressure drop matters more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A reliable selection workflow begins with service data, calculates Cv at several operating points, checks the installed characteristic, verifies the useful control window, reviews cavitation and noise, and only then compares valve style and cost. Carter Valve can support this process with butterfly valve platforms, globe and severe-service control valves, actuator guidance, and application-based engineering review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

Is a butterfly valve or globe valve better for control applications?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

A globe valve is generally better for precise throttling, wide rangeability, and severe pressure-drop control. A butterfly valve is often better for large-flow, low-to-moderate pressure-drop services where compact size, high Cv, and lower installed cost are important.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Can a butterfly valve be used as a control valve?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Yes. A high-performance butterfly valve can be used for modulating control when the service conditions, operating travel, pressure drop, leakage requirement, and actuator resolution are suitable. It should not be selected only because it is cheaper or has high Cv.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Why are globe valves considered better for throttling?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Globe valves use plug-and-seat trim that can be shaped for linear or equal-percentage flow characteristics. This gives more predictable control, better low-flow resolution, and more options for cavitation, flashing, and noise control.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

What does Cv mean in valve sizing?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Cv is a flow coefficient that expresses valve flow capacity for a given pressure drop and fluid condition. A higher Cv means more flow capacity at the same pressure drop, but too much Cv can make the valve oversized and difficult to control.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

What is rangeability in a control valve?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Rangeability is the ratio between the maximum and minimum controllable flow where the valve can still regulate effectively. It is not the same as full mechanical travel from closed to open.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Why can an oversized valve cause poor control?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

An oversized valve may operate near closed position during normal flow. In that region, small stem or disc movement can create a large flow change, causing hunting, instability, and poor resolution.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Which valve has higher Cv, butterfly or globe?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

For the same nominal size, a butterfly valve usually has higher Cv because its flow path is more open. A globe valve usually has lower Cv but better throttling control and pressure-drop management.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Should a control valve also provide tight shutoff?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Sometimes, but not always. If tight shutoff is safety-critical, it may be better to use a dedicated isolation valve in series rather than forcing the control valve to perform both precise modulation and isolation duty.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

References<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

[1] Spirax Sarco \u2014 Control Valve Characteristics<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2] Valin \u2014 Control Valve Flow Characteristics<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[3] Emerson \u2014 Control Valve Sizing<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[4] ISA \u2014 ISA75.01, Control Valve Sizing Equations<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[5] Bray \u2014 Control Valve Sizing<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[6] Emerson \u2014 Control Valve Handbook<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[7] Carter Valve \u2014 What Is a Control Valve? Types and Components<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Butterfly valve vs globe valve for control applications is not a simple \u201ccheap valve versus precise valve\u201d decision. A butterfly valve is usually a compact, rotary, high-Cv option for large-flow, low-to-moderate pressure-drop services, while a globe valve is usually the stronger choice when the loop needs high throttling precision, predictable trim characterization, severe pressure-drop handling, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1128,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1122"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1122\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1129,"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1122\/revisions\/1129"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cartervalves.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}